|
Post by thetruth on Aug 7, 2014 11:30:30 GMT -5
Man I tell you there is some real stuff happening at the WAYNE SCOTT UNIT NO ONE KNOWS. Sad thing is upper administration knows about some dirty things and still try to cover it up. I go to work and see a lot. More to come......what to do if administration itself will not do anything about the situation? You are stuck.....
|
|
|
Post by mley1 on Aug 7, 2014 18:19:49 GMT -5
There's always Channel 2 News!!! They'll get'em to handle'up..
|
|
|
Post by thetruth on Aug 7, 2014 21:49:45 GMT -5
I didnt think you can just go to the media. I'll take that in consideration. But dont I need evidence?
|
|
|
Post by bobothebeaten on Aug 7, 2014 21:51:20 GMT -5
Man I tell you there is some real stuff happening at the WAYNE SCOTT UNIT NO ONE KNOWS. Sad thing is upper administration knows about some dirty things and still try to cover it up. I go to work and see a lot. More to come......what to do if administration itself will not do anything about the situation? You are stuck..... I heard shit is hitting the fan because they are down to just 500 bags of Vitapro.
|
|
|
Post by thetruth on Aug 8, 2014 8:15:09 GMT -5
Well I never heard of vitapro. What is that?
All I know now is that the Warden there likes to cover people up to avoid EEO rates but, there is no way public can be or feel safe safe if people are going to work for the wrong reasons. He likes to talk to people and negociate with them to keep heat out of his unit.
Dirty is dirty and that includes relationships with officers and administration. Plus he and others are married. Walking off an officer for reationships with inmates and having realtionships with superiors is breaking policy and I hate employess breaking policy because I believe that if they break a simple one they're capable of breaking any policy that can put any of us in danger.
|
|
|
Post by bobothebeaten on Aug 10, 2014 21:22:08 GMT -5
Well I never heard of vitapro. What is that? All I know now is that the Warden there likes to cover people up to avoid EEO rates but, there is no way public can be or feel safe safe if people are going to wrk for the wrong reasons. He likes to talk to people and negociate with them to keep heat out of his unit. Dirty is dirty and that includes relationships with officers and administration. Plus he and others are married. Walking off an officer for reationships with inmates and having realtionships with superiors is breaking policy and I hate employess breaking policy because I believe that if they break a simple one they're capable of breaking any policy that can put any of us in danger. Vitapro was miracle powder for the convicts back in the day. Just add water, form it into any shape and put a tag on it calling it beef, chicken, fish, etc. and that's what it became. Post the policy that says you can't boink the help. Is someone at work boinkin' your ole' lady?
|
|
|
Post by Gooday on Aug 12, 2014 14:32:50 GMT -5
In response to God...
"Post the policy that says you can't boink the help. Is someone at work boinkin' your ole' lady?"
Policy does say rank cannot have any kind of relationship with an officer or lower ranking employee. So yes that is against policy. If thats what boinking you are referring to. So if that is happening. Thetruth has the right to file EEO against them. Its called third party.
|
|
|
Post by bobothebeaten on Aug 12, 2014 16:32:49 GMT -5
In response to God... "Post the policy that says you can't boink the help. Is someone at work boinkin' your ole' lady?" Policy does say rank cannot have any kind of relationship with an officer or lower ranking employee. So yes that is against policy. If thats what boinking you are referring to. So if that is happening. Thetruth has the right to file EEO against them. Its called third party. Well I'd like to see a copy of that policy. You're only complaining cause you're not getting any. At work or at home. I get more than I can handle.
|
|
|
Post by thetruth on Aug 13, 2014 9:05:08 GMT -5
To "GOD" "MR Gooday" has a point. There is policy that states that there is to be no rank and employee relationships. If you work for the state you would know. No need for childish proof when you have it in you hands everyday. It just look at your comment as another person that likes to sleep around. Situations like this is what Makes the public unsafe as employees tend to go to work for the wrong reasons and even get on "their unacceptable behavior" while on duty. No need to show policy if you know it. Or you might just see it in the new one day.
|
|
|
Post by bobothebeaten on Aug 13, 2014 11:24:06 GMT -5
To "GOD" "MR Gooday" has a point. There is policy that states that there is to be no rank and employee relationships. If you work for the state you would know. No need for childish proof when you have it in you hands everyday. It just look at your comment as another person that likes to sleep around. Situations like this is what Makes the public unsafe as employees tend to go to work for the wrong reasons and even get on "their unacceptable behavior" while on duty. No need to show policy if you know it. Or you might just see it in the new one day. Please just call me BoBo. I have worked for TDCJ for 28 years and have never read that policy. For many years subordinate employees would make that allegation against me when I pushed them to get their work done or if they didn't like their Employee Performance Evaluation. Their false allegations would get a lot of attention and was investigated many times. It would take the heat off of them. It's any easy allegation to make and even though it was never proved it's one of those things that people never forget or just let die. One day I realized that even if it was true that it didn't violate written policy so why is it even being looked at. During investigations I always asked for the rule violation, but the investigator could never provide it. They would say it fell under creating a hostile work environment. Well to me making false allegations and spreading false rumors created a hostile work environment. I have been married to the same woman for 40 years and I've never strayed, but for the purpose of keeping the people I work with happy and the managers happy I will admit that I have a very large pecker that satisfies the ladies - all the ladies. That's what they want to believe so okay, I'll just go with it. You don't just say someone is boinkin' someone without clear evidence because it creates harm to all parties involved both personally and professionally. If you spread those rumors then you are a bigger whore than the people you are accusing. I have learned over my career that a lie may or may not be believable, but the bigger the lie and the more often it's repeated the more likely it is to be believed. Pretty much people suck! Now you want some of this..........there's plenty to go around.
|
|
|
Post by mley1 on Aug 13, 2014 11:53:32 GMT -5
To "GOD" "MR Gooday" has a point. There is policy that states that there is to be no rank and employee relationships. If you work for the state you would know. No need for childish proof when you have it in you hands everyday. It just look at your comment as another person that likes to sleep around. Situations like this is what Makes the public unsafe as employees tend to go to work for the wrong reasons and even get on "their unacceptable behavior" while on duty. No need to show policy if you know it. Or you might just see it in the new one day. Please just call me BoBo. I have worked for TDCJ for 28 years and have never read that policy. For many years subordinate employees would make that allegation against me when I pushed them to get their work done or if they didn't like their Employee Performance Evaluation. Their false allegations would get a lot of attention and was investigated many times. It would take the heat off of them. It's any easy allegation to make and even though it was never proved it's one of those things that people never forget or just let die. One day I realized that even if it was true that it didn't violate written policy so why is it even being looked at. During investigations I always asked for the rule violation, but the investigator could never provide it. They would say it fell under creating a hostile work environment. Well to me making false allegations and spreading false rumors created a hostile work environment. I have been married to the same woman for 40 years and I've never strayed, but for the purpose of keeping the people I work with happy and the managers happy I will admit that I have a very large pecker that satisfies the ladies - all the ladies. That's what they want to believe so okay, I'll just go with it. You don't just say someone is boinkin' someone without clear evidence because it creates harm to all parties involved both personally and professionally. If you spread those rumors then you are a bigger whore than the people you are accusing. I have learned over my career that a lie may or may not be believable, but the bigger the lie and the more often it's repeated the more likely it is to be believed. Pretty much people suck! Now you want some of this..........there's plenty to go around. Bobo, you never read the policy because it does not exist. There is a policy, however, on nepotism. Basically, that policy says there cannot be a family member in your direct line of command. For example, if you are married to an employee they may not be in your supervisory line of command. There is NOTHING that says you can't boink the help, subordinates or supervisors. Is it frowned upon? YES. But, nothing in policy says you can't do it with your fellow employee's. There are MANY, MANY employee's who are married to other employee's, have relationships......etc. It is NOT against policy.
|
|
|
Post by mley1 on Aug 13, 2014 11:57:13 GMT -5
To "GOD" "MR Gooday" has a point. There is policy that states that there is to be no rank and employee relationships. If you work for the state you would know. No need for childish proof when you have it in you hands everyday. It just look at your comment as another person that likes to sleep around. Situations like this is what Makes the public unsafe as employees tend to go to work for the wrong reasons and even get on "their unacceptable behavior" while on duty. No need to show policy if you know it. Or you might just see it in the new one day. UH, no there isn't. Please provide the policy if there is one as you say. In over 30yrs of service I've never seen it, or read one that says rank and employee's may not have a relationship. In fact, there are MANY employee's married to one another of different ranks.
|
|
|
Post by bobothebeaten on Aug 13, 2014 13:27:58 GMT -5
Please just call me BoBo. I have worked for TDCJ for 28 years and have never read that policy. For many years subordinate employees would make that allegation against me when I pushed them to get their work done or if they didn't like their Employee Performance Evaluation. Their false allegations would get a lot of attention and was investigated many times. It would take the heat off of them. It's any easy allegation to make and even though it was never proved it's one of those things that people never forget or just let die. One day I realized that even if it was true that it didn't violate written policy so why is it even being looked at. During investigations I always asked for the rule violation, but the investigator could never provide it. They would say it fell under creating a hostile work environment. Well to me making false allegations and spreading false rumors created a hostile work environment. I have been married to the same woman for 40 years and I've never strayed, but for the purpose of keeping the people I work with happy and the managers happy I will admit that I have a very large pecker that satisfies the ladies - all the ladies. That's what they want to believe so okay, I'll just go with it. You don't just say someone is boinkin' someone without clear evidence because it creates harm to all parties involved both personally and professionally. If you spread those rumors then you are a bigger whore than the people you are accusing. I have learned over my career that a lie may or may not be believable, but the bigger the lie and the more often it's repeated the more likely it is to be believed. Pretty much people suck! Now you want some of this..........there's plenty to go around. Bobo, you never read the policy because it does not exist. There is a policy, however, on nepotism. Basically, that policy says there cannot be a family member in your direct line of command. For example, if you are married to an employee they may not be in your supervisory line of command. There is NOTHING that says you can't boink the help, subordinates or supervisors. Is it frowned upon? YES. But, nothing in policy says you can't do it with your fellow employee's. There are MANY, MANY employee's who are married to other employee's, have relationships......etc. It is NOT against policy. Marty - I knew there wasn't policy specific to that. I just wanted poster "thetruth" to provide the document he/she believes exists. Also, during my 28 years of service I've learned that when someone doesn't know policy they'll just make it up. After having been through multiple investigations for allegedly boinkin' one of my staff there was never a finding of guilt because the events never happened and there was no proof. Unfortunately, the lady who I was accused of boinkin' daughter also worked there. The pig who kept filing false complaints filed another one and said that I was boinkin' both the mother and the daughter. She said because of that I was distributing the work unequally and treated other people unfairly. I had created a hostile work environment. Good grief! I will admit that when the investigator came down from EEO Huntsville that I was very combative and hostile towards his questions. By this time the only ones who were creating a hostile work environment were the few people initiating false complaints. I asked the investigator if I should just admit that I had both ladies bent over my desk and was boinkin' them side by side? He said, "Well, BoBo if that's the truth then that's what I want to hear". As with all the preceding investigations there was no finding of guilt. In the end the daughter was so humiliated and disgusted by what she had gone through that shortly after that she quit. I came to realize that the people who were filing the false complaints were just a small part of the problem. I lay most the blame on management who tolerated people filing false allegations. I believe that if clearly the allegation can be proved to be malicious and false that that person should be charged and disciplined. In this agency if management has a "hard on" for you they welcome and encourage complaints. If boinkin' staff is such a big deal (which I would not encourage) then make a policy against it like they do with everything else. If not, then shut the fork up!
|
|
|
Post by bobothebeaten on Aug 13, 2014 13:33:12 GMT -5
I didnt think you can just go to the media. I'll take that in consideration. But dont I need evidence? The truth is not the truth just because you say so. Of course you need evidence you idiot. Why should you be believed just because you say it's true. You can go to the media and you can also go to the highest mountain and jump off. You sound like trouble for any supervisor and I hope you have a very short career. Tell your ole' lady she'll have to miss her turn in my rotation because something else came up. I'll make it up next week.
|
|
|
Post by thetruth on Aug 13, 2014 13:58:34 GMT -5
Bobo, you never read the policy because it does not exist. There is a policy, however, on nepotism. Basically, that policy says there cannot be a family member in your direct line of command. For example, if you are married to an employee they may not be in your supervisory line of command. There is NOTHING that says you can't boink the help, subordinates or supervisors. Is it frowned upon? YES. But, nothing in policy says you can't do it with your fellow employee's. There are MANY, MANY employee's who are married to other employee's, have relationships......etc. It is NOT against policy. Marty - I knew there wasn't policy specific to that. I just wanted poster "thetruth" to provide the document he/she believes exists. Also, during my 28 years of service I've learned that when someone doesn't know policy they'll just make it up. After having been through multiple investigations for allegedly boinkin' one of my staff there was never a finding of guilt because the events never happened and there was no proof. Unfortunately, the lady who I was accused of boinkin' daughter also worked there. The pig who kept filing false complaints filed another one and said that I was boinkin' both the mother and the daughter. She said because of that I was distributing the work unequally and treated other people unfairly. I had created a hostile work environment. Good grief! I will admit that when the investigator came down from EEO Huntsville that I was very combative and hostile towards his questions. By this time the only ones who were creating a hostile work environment were the few people initiating false complaints. I asked the investigator if I should just admit that I had both ladies bent over my desk and was boinkin' them side by side? He said, "Well, BoBo if that's the truth then that's what I want to hear". As with all the preceding investigations there was no finding of guilt. In the end the daughter was so humiliated and disgusted by what she had gone through that shortly after that she quit. I came to realize that the people who were filing the false complaints were just a small part of the problem. I lay most the blame on management who tolerated people filing false allegations. I believe that if clearly the allegation can be proved to be malicious and false that that person should be charged and disciplined. In this agency if management has a "hard on" for you they welcome and encourage complaints. If boinkin' staff is such a big deal (which I would not encourage) then make a policy against it like they do with everything else. If not, then shut the fork up! My apologies to y'all but what I meant to say is what mley1 said about the line of command. Is that in policy? Because as far as I was told in training that was it. In what section of policy is this enforced? I believe there was a misunderstanding as far as that. I made Bobo mad apparently. I completely understand and thats why i am here. Don't want allegations and a big case like yours to be made. I really see where bobo is coming from but the real people that are doing it need to be reprimanded. I am only here to reveal the truth. Also make my work environment a better efficient way to work at. Ye,s I have have the supporting evidence and I would not like to make this a big allegation without evidence. I have a wife and I do not desire to be unfaithful. I wouldn't want my wife doing so. I just strongly believe that when coworkers around me are doing this it distracts their work and duty abilities and interests towards the public and other employees. This is where favoritism comes in and not everyone is a happy camper. Not too long ago I was a witness of one of our ranking officers here at my unit that went to jail over beating his wife and all because of those sluts at work that try to offer themselves like they did me. The wife found out and made a big ordeal. Now like I said still trying to put this puzzle together and do not want to start gossip but only come to the bottom of it all. It does affect my job as far as.... Ex: When this rank officer was out for almost 2 months we had to deal with extra workload due to these kind of incidents and decisions rank makes. We are already short staffed and have many issues going on like Busting dirty employees and you wonder why things like this happen. Not everyone is caught because of "its too hard to bust them". They reason why dirty is not getting caught is because of ranks' conflict of interests at work with lower subordinate employees. The married I can understand but also they do not work under each other. Any thoughts?
|
|