|
Post by Stan the Bug Man on Aug 15, 2014 7:55:34 GMT -5
Untruth, you have some issues expressing yourself, at least in my opinion. I just want to make the comment that issues of sexual misconduct, favoritism, unfair work distribution, etc, are present in any large agency, public or private. They are not confined to just correctional institutions. These things are not right, do cause conflicts in our personal life ( I too speak from personal knowledge), and need to be corrected. That said, it is nearly difficult to enforce any policy to combat those issues. Developing a better policy is like the old adage, "build a better mouse trap and .......". Hang in there folks retirement makes it all seem worthwhile. I still have a paycheck rolling in every month and my biggest problem now, is deciding what flavor of cookies I want with my first cup of coffee each day!
|
|
|
Post by mley1 on Aug 16, 2014 8:45:12 GMT -5
Untruth, you have some issues expressing yourself, at least in my opinion. I just want to make the comment that issues of sexual misconduct, favoritism, unfair work distribution, etc, are present in any large agency, public or private. They are not confined to just correctional institutions. These things are not right, do cause conflicts in our personal life ( I too speak from personal knowledge), and need to be corrected. That said, it is nearly difficult to enforce any policy to combat those issues. Developing a better policy is like the old adage, "build a better mouse trap and .......". Hang in there folks retirement makes it all seem worthwhile. I still have a paycheck rolling in every month and my biggest problem now, is deciding what flavor of cookies I want with my first cup of coffee each day! Stan, you've prolly seen more than most around here. Thanks for your input brother. I stayed retired for only a year. Gotta get my kids through college, and corrections is what I know, so back I went. But, with a whole new attitude if ya know what I mean.
|
|
|
Post by mley1 on Aug 16, 2014 8:54:56 GMT -5
Marty - I knew there wasn't policy specific to that. I just wanted poster "thetruth" to provide the document he/she believes exists. Also, during my 28 years of service I've learned that when someone doesn't know policy they'll just make it up. After having been through multiple investigations for allegedly boinkin' one of my staff there was never a finding of guilt because the events never happened and there was no proof. Unfortunately, the lady who I was accused of boinkin' daughter also worked there. The pig who kept filing false complaints filed another one and said that I was boinkin' both the mother and the daughter. She said because of that I was distributing the work unequally and treated other people unfairly. I had created a hostile work environment. Good grief! I will admit that when the investigator came down from EEO Huntsville that I was very combative and hostile towards his questions. By this time the only ones who were creating a hostile work environment were the few people initiating false complaints. I asked the investigator if I should just admit that I had both ladies bent over my desk and was boinkin' them side by side? He said, "Well, BoBo if that's the truth then that's what I want to hear". As with all the preceding investigations there was no finding of guilt. In the end the daughter was so humiliated and disgusted by what she had gone through that shortly after that she quit. I came to realize that the people who were filing the false complaints were just a small part of the problem. I lay most the blame on management who tolerated people filing false allegations. I believe that if clearly the allegation can be proved to be malicious and false that that person should be charged and disciplined. In this agency if management has a "hard on" for you they welcome and encourage complaints. If boinkin' staff is such a big deal (which I would not encourage) then make a policy against it like they do with everything else. If not, then shut the fork up! My apologies to y'all but what I meant to say is what mley1 said about the line of command. Is that in policy? Because as far as I was told in training that was it. In what section of policy is this enforced? I believe there was a misunderstanding as far as that. I made Bobo mad apparently. I completely understand and thats why i am here. Don't want allegations and a big case like yours to be made. I really see where bobo is coming from but the real people that are doing it need to be reprimanded. I am only here to reveal the truth. Also make my work environment a better efficient way to work at. Ye,s I have have the supporting evidence and I would not like to make this a big allegation without evidence. I have a wife and I do not desire to be unfaithful. I wouldn't want my wife doing so. I just strongly believe that when coworkers around me are doing this it distracts their work and duty abilities and interests towards the public and other employees. This is where favoritism comes in and not everyone is a happy camper. Not too long ago I was a witness of one of our ranking officers here at my unit that went to jail over beating his wife and all because of those sluts at work that try to offer themselves like they did me. The wife found out and made a big ordeal. Now like I said still trying to put this puzzle together and do not want to start gossip but only come to the bottom of it all. It does affect my job as far as.... Ex: When this rank officer was out for almost 2 months we had to deal with extra workload due to these kind of incidents and decisions rank makes. We are already short staffed and have many issues going on like Busting dirty employees and you wonder why things like this happen. Not everyone is caught because of "its too hard to bust them". They reason why dirty is not getting caught is because of ranks' conflict of interests at work with lower subordinate employees. The married I can understand but also they do not work under each other. Any thoughts? If I recal correctly the policy regarding nepatism is in a personnel directive. Off hand, I don't remember which one. I never worried about that kind of stuff. My whole career I always came to work, worked where I was assigned, and followed lawful orders. I always took care of my supervisors, and still do. And, I've NEVER had any trouble getting along at work. I don't bite the hand that feeds me. But, that's me. That's not to say I condone misconduct. I don't. But, I'll tell you from experience, REAL misconduct eventually gets dealt with in one way or another. I've said it before, bad karma is a bitch. And, she'll bitch slap anyone who pisses her off.
|
|
|
Post by Quasi Infume-Bey on Aug 28, 2014 1:38:25 GMT -5
Bobo, you never read the policy because it does not exist. There is a policy, however, on nepotism. Basically, that policy says there cannot be a family member in your direct line of command. For example, if you are married to an employee they may not be in your supervisory line of command. There is NOTHING that says you can't boink the help, subordinates or supervisors. Is it frowned upon? YES. But, nothing in policy says you can't do it with your fellow employee's. There are MANY, MANY employee's who are married to other employee's, have relationships......etc. It is NOT against policy. Marty - I knew there wasn't policy specific to that. I just wanted poster "thetruth" to provide the document he/she believes exists. Also, during my 28 years of service I've learned that when someone doesn't know policy they'll just make it up. After having been through multiple investigations for allegedly boinkin' one of my staff there was never a finding of guilt because the events never happened and there was no proof. Unfortunately, the lady who I was accused of boinkin' daughter also worked there. The pig who kept filing false complaints filed another one and said that I was boinkin' both the mother and the daughter. She said because of that I was distributing the work unequally and treated other people unfairly. I had created a hostile work environment. Good grief! I will admit that when the investigator came down from EEO Huntsville that I was very combative and hostile towards his questions. By this time the only ones who were creating a hostile work environment were the few people initiating false complaints. I asked the investigator if I should just admit that I had both ladies bent over my desk and was boinkin' them side by side? He said, "Well, BoBo if that's the truth then that's what I want to hear". As with all the preceding investigations there was no finding of guilt. In the end the daughter was so humiliated and disgusted by what she had gone through that shortly after that she quit. I came to realize that the people who were filing the false complaints were just a small part of the problem. I lay most the blame on management who tolerated people filing false allegations. I believe that if clearly the allegation can be proved to be malicious and false that that person should be charged and disciplined. In this agency if management has a "hard on" for you they welcome and encourage complaints. If boinkin' staff is such a big deal (which I would not encourage) then make a policy against it like they do with everything else. If not, then shut the fork up! Baby, I'm wiff BoBo. I thanks you should be able ta boink whoever it is you wants ta boink as long as dey ain't no "Offender." Free love an' all de poontaine you can git! Dat's what I likes!
|
|
|
Post by pota10 on Mar 19, 2016 22:39:01 GMT -5
Ya know I left wayne scott not too long ago and upper admin has gotten bad and I point this to the major. he is soo 2 faced and he has caused so many good people to transfer quit or he would look for things to write them up on so they would get walked off, even though some earned their walk off, most did not. He smiles in your face then stabs you in the back, and there are a lot there that can see this but won't say anything because of being targeted for write ups. Mot all the upper admin is bad but because of this issue morale is low and a lot of call ins but some are allowed to get away with a lot more than other officers, it all boild down to the major and how he pushes and of course the asst warden listens to him, the current Sr warden seems ok but one bad in the group can infect all in time or mabey not, time will tell
|
|